Dealing with Rejection

By: Josh Sloat

Overcoming 101, 102, 103, and 112

So, your patent application got rejected. Now what? 

In this month’s episode, we’re talking about rejection. Specifically, the type that comes from the patent office in the form of an intimidating sounding three-digit number when your application gets denied by an examiner. Some time after submitting your application, it goes into a process with the patent office called examination. This is the part of your patent’s prosecution journey where an examiner reviews your application for conformance to technical and legal requirements. If – and usually when – the examiner finds a problem, they will issue an office action that contains specific reasons for the rejection. You then have the opportunity to respond to and overcome the rejection, using various strategies we’ll explore today.  
​

​Reasons for rejection fall under four sections of U.S. Statute, Title 35. Sections 101, 102, 103, and 112 dictate that patents must be eligible, useful, novel, nonobvious, and enabled (or properly described). Patents can be rejected or later invalidated if one or more of the claims are determined to be otherwise. 

Rejection on the basis of these four statutes is fortunately just the beginning of the delicate process of negotiating this important exchange that has promoted and enabled our innovation economy since the dawn of our country. Patent application rejection is common, expected, and can be used very strategically – but perhaps counterintuitively – to end up with the broadest possible protection, while also making sure there’s something in it for the public!
​

Episode Overview

In today’s episode, Patent Office Relationship Guru Daniel Wright leads a discussion with our all-star patent panel, delving deeply into defining, coping with, and then dealing with patent application rejection. Along the way, Dan and the panel discuss:

• Why patent applications are rejected.
• The specific types of rejection.
  
• Strategies for how to overcome each, including some wonderful insider insights specifically on how to work with examiners on the human level to overcome rejection.

Mossoff Minute: Patents Aren't Monopolies

In this month's Mossoff Minute, Professor Adam Mossoff debunks the myth that patents in the United States are monopolies that impeded innovation and block economic growth. We’re also publishing excerpts as short-form videos on Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, and TikTok.
​

Next Episode Preview: ParkerVision and Rule 36

We’re excited to announce that we'll be releasing a very special episode next month, in which we’ll be interviewing Jeffrey Parker, the CEO of ParkerVision. ParkerVision is filing a U.S. Supreme Court Cert Petition challenging the Federal Circuit’s practice of issuing one-word affirmations (Rule 36) in cases that hold life-altering implications for inventors. ParkerVision’s petition aims to establish a baseline of judicial respect for patent holders, as judicial reasoning is key to what makes a court decision a valid court decision. 

How to Listen

Patently Strategic is available on all major podcasting directories, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify. We're also available on 12 other directories including Stitcher, iHeart Radio, and TuneIn, so you should be able to find us wherever you listen to podcasts.
​

Resources

To further explore the topics discussed, see the following past episodes and resources:

Related Episodes

• Patent Anatomy: What's in a patent?
• Why Patents Exist with Professor Adam Mossoff
• Patent Searching (How to Find Prior Art)
• After Final Practice: Life After Final Rejection
• Fortifying Life Science Patents (101 and 112)
• Software Patents (101)
• From Alice to Axle
• Obviousness Case Law Review (103)
• SCOTUS in Focus (112)
• Unpredictable Arts (112)

Transcripts​
We're also providing computer-generated transcripts for improved accessibility and additional reference opportunities.

Slides
For the visual learners out there, we also like to make our presenter slides available for your reference.​